RETHINKING RISK-TAKING: THE DEATH OF VOLENTI?

Abstract

Volenti non fit injuria allows a negligent defendant to escape liability by showing that the claimant voluntarily and willingly accepted the risk in question. This article combines the theoretical limitations of the volenti defence with a case analysis of how its application has played out in the real world, and argues it is not fit for modern tort law. The defence has a controversial and chequered history, being described as a so-called principle ... of little help: indeed, it is confusing, unnecessary, and if we are not careful, it will lead us to the wrong outcome. It is submitted that volenti is based on unjustified concepts of people agreeing to risks, leads to harmful outcomes and that the defence does not fit with current approaches to tort liability. This article therefore concludes that the harmful outcomes of the volenti defence far exceed any potential benefits provided, and the defence should therefore be abolished.