Abstract
Introduction Several teaching methods have been used in clinical nursing teaching to increase quality and efficiency, but disagreements over their effects persist. This study will evaluate the effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing on nursing students' knowledge, skill scores, learning satisfaction, and patients' satisfaction. Methods We will conduct searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), China Biological literature database (CBM), Wanfang Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (CSTJ) up to April 2022. Relevant randomized controlled trials meeting the eligibility criteria will be included. And the study selection and data extraction will be independently screened for eligibility by two authors. The quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted using Rev Man, Stata, and R software. Statistical analyses including homogeneity tests, sensitivity analysis, transitivity tests, consistency tests, and publication bias will be completed. Ethics and dissemination No formal research ethics approval is required. The results will be disseminated to a peerreviewed journal for publication.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ni, J., Wu, P., Huang, X., Zhang, F., You, Z., Chang, Q., & Liao, L. (2022, August 1). Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273693
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.