Resilience ethics: Responsibility and the globally embedded subject

29Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article seeks to analyse the rise of 'resilience ethics', in terms of the shift in ethical approaches away from the hierarchical liberal internationalist constructions of the 1990s and towards broader and more inclusive understandings of ethical responsibility for global problems. This shift in ethical attention away from the formal international politics of inter-state relations and towards the unintended consequences of both institutional structures and the informal market choices of individuals has diversified understandings of global ethical responsibilities. It is argued that the recasting of ethical responsibility in the increasingly sociological terms of unintended and indirect consequences of socio-material embeddedness constructs new ethical differentials and hierarchies of responsibility. These framings have facilitated new policy practices, recasting interventionist policy-making in terms of the growing self-awareness and reflexivity of Western actors, reframing ethical foreign policy as starting with the choices of individual citizens, and, at the same time, operating to reify the relations of the market. © 2013 D. Chandler.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chandler, D. (2013). Resilience ethics: Responsibility and the globally embedded subject. Ethics and Global Politics, 6(3), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v6i3.21695

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free