Stakeholders' perspectives on the effects of a pep grant on a district-wide CSPAP

1Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program (CSPAP) can help children be physically active for 60 min/day. Physical Education for Progress grants provided opportunities to improve physical education and physical activity programming. Purpose: This study explored stakeholders' perspectives on the effects of a Physical Education for Progress grant on a district-wide CSPAP. Method: Stakeholders included physical educators (n = 10; K-12), administrators (n = 6), and one superintendent. Individual, semistructured interviews were used to examine how the grant affected stakeholders' perspectives of the CSPAP. Results: The grant affected the CSPAP by providing (a) opportunities for professional development, (b) opportunities to establish a K-12 curriculum map, and (c) access to equipment and resources. Discussion: Framed in social ecological theory, intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, and community levels were influenced by the grant. Interactions between levels enabled changes in all CSPAP components, especially quality PE. Conclusion: A Physical Education for Progress grant is a successful mechanism to enhance a district-wide CSPAP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abel-Berei, C. P., Karp, G. G., Fennell, M., Drake, E., & Olsen, S. (2021). Stakeholders’ perspectives on the effects of a pep grant on a district-wide CSPAP. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1123/JTPE.2019-0001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free