Considering the case for biodiversity cycles: Re-examining the evidence for periodicity in the fossil record

40Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We re-examine the evidence for a 62 million year (Myr) periodicity in biodiversity throughout the Phanerozoic history of animal life reported by [1], as well as related questions of periodicity in origination and extinction. We find that the signal is robust against variations in methods of analysis, and is based on fluctuations in the Paleozoic and a substantial part of the Mesozoic. Examination of origination and extinction is somewhat ambiguous, with results depending upon procedure. Origination and extinction intensity as defined by [1] may be affected by an artifact at 27 Myr in the duration of stratigraphic intervals. Nevertheless, when a procedure free of this artifact is implemented, the 27 Myr periodicity appears in origination, suggesting that the artifact may ultimately be based on a signal in the data. A 62 Myr feature appears in extinction, when, this same procedure is used. We conclude that evidence for a periodicity at 62 Myr is robust, and evidence for periodicity at approximately 27 Myr is also present, albeit more ambiguous. © 2007 Lieberman, Melott.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lieberman, B. S., & Melott, A. L. (2007). Considering the case for biodiversity cycles: Re-examining the evidence for periodicity in the fossil record. PLoS ONE, 2(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000759

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free