This overview finds evidence for concern about the ability of thegovernments in Colombia and Venezuela to hold free and fair electionsand a trend toward the concentration of executive power in mostcountries in the sub-region. The separation of powers has been mostsharply eroded in Venezuela; but Bolivia and Ecuador are moving in asimilar direction. Colombia has a robust constitutional order, includinga remarkably independent judiciary which has resisted the concentrationof executive power by refusing to let the president stand for a thirdterm. At the same time, most Andean countries are experimenting with newmechanisms of participation. There are sharp contrasts between the modelof participation in Bolivia and Venezuela, two countries often lumpedtogether by observers; and, despite ideological differences, strikingsimilarities in the presidential styles of Presidents Uribe and Chavez.Among Andean nations, only Chile is not undergoing a revolution inparticipation. Finally, Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador have re-writtentheir constitutions in an attempt to encourage the exercise ofconstituent power. These cases exhibit variation in terms of the degreeto which deliberative, pluralistic, lawful, and constitutionalprocedures were used.
CITATION STYLE
CAMERON, M. A. (2010). The State of Democracy in the Andes: Introduction to a thematic issue of Revista de Ciencia Política. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 30(1). https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-090x2010000100002
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.