Clinical Utility of Pharmacogene Panel-Based Testing in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

13Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We aimed to estimate the utility of panel-based pharmacogenetic testing of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Utilization of Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortium (CPIC) level A/B drugs after PCI was estimated in a national sample of IBM MarketScan beneficiaries. Genotype data from University of Florida (UF) patients (n = 211) who underwent PCI were used to project genotype-guided opportunities among MarketScan beneficiaries with at least one (N = 105,547) and five (N = 12,462) years of follow-up data. The actual incidence of genotype-guided prescribing opportunities was determined among UF patients. In MarketScan, 50.0% (52,799/105,547) over 1 year and 68.0% (8,473/12,462) over 5 years had ≥ 1 CPIC A/B drug besides antiplatelet therapy prescribed, with a projected incidence of genotype-guided prescribing opportunities of 39% at 1 year and 52% at 5 years. Genotype-guided prescribing opportunities occurred in 32% of UF patients. Projected and actual incidence of genotype-guided opportunities among two cohorts supports the utility of panel-based testing among patients who underwent PCI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

El Rouby, N., Alrwisan, A., Langaee, T., Lipori, G., Angiolillo, D. J., Franchi, F., … Winterstein, A. G. (2020). Clinical Utility of Pharmacogene Panel-Based Testing in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Clinical and Translational Science, 13(3), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12729

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free