Test–retest reliability of the Friedreich’s ataxia rating scale

13Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The modified Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) is a disease specific, exam-based neurological rating scale commonly used as a outcome measure in clinical trials. While extensive clinimetric testing indicates it’s validity in measuring disease progression, formal test–retest reliability was lacking. To fill this gap, we acquired results from screening and baseline visits of several large clinical trials and calculated intraclass correlation coefficients, coefficients of variance, standard error, and the minimally detectable changes. This study demonstrated excellent test–retest reliability of the mFARS, and it’s upright stability subscore.

References Powered by Scopus

Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability

19186Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research

18209Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Forming Inferences about Some Intraclass Correlation Coefficients

5433Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Recessive cerebellar and afferent ataxias — clinical challenges and future directions

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Friedreich's Ataxia related Diabetes: Epidemiology and management practices

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Digital endpoints for self-administered home-based functional assessment in pediatric Friedreich’s ataxia

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rummey, C., Zesiewicz, T. A., Perez-Lloret, S., Farmer, J. M., Pandolfo, M., & Lynch, D. R. (2020). Test–retest reliability of the Friedreich’s ataxia rating scale. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, 7(9), 1708–1712. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51118

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

53%

Researcher 6

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 6

40%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

27%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

20%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free