Intratumoral Heterogeneity Accounts for Apparent Progression of Noninvasive Serous Tumors to Invasive Low-grade Serous Carcinoma: A Study of 30 Low-grade Serous Tumors of the Ovary in 18 Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Abstract

Noninvasive ovarian low-grade serous tumors [atypical proliferative serous tumor (APST)/serous borderline tumor] appear to progress to invasive low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) at a low but regular rate. The underlying biology of this phenomenon is unknown. We studied 18 patients with 30 ovarian tumors (12 bilateral), including APST, noninvasive LGSC and invasive LGSC, who also had low-grade serous carcinomatosis. Tumors were evaluated for microinvasion (usual eosinophilic cell type), microinvasive carcinoma (<5 mm invasion of micropapillary nests), and overt carcinoma (≥5 mm invasion of micropapillary nests). Tumors were evaluated based on the original numerical order of sections under the hypothetical scenarios in which sampling was stopped at 1 section/cm and 2 sections/cm. Sampling based on 1 section/cm of greatest tumor dimension identified invasion of any type in 21 tumors (70%). Among these 21 tumors, 10 had microinvasive carcinoma, and 11 overt carcinoma. Sampling based on 2 sections/cm identified microinvasive carcinoma in 9 tumors and overt carcinoma in 14 tumors. With increased sampling from 1 to 2 sections/cm, the diagnosis in 3 tumors would have changed from microinvasive carcinoma to overt carcinoma, and in an additional 2 tumors from APST to APST with microinvasive carcinoma. Sampling based on >2 sections/cm changed the diagnosis in 1 additional case of APST with microinvasive carcinoma to overt carcinoma. These findings support that undetected (unsampled) occult invasion in the primary ovarian tumors is a likely explanation for some cases of apparent progression of noninvasive low-grade serous ovarian tumors to invasive LGSC. To minimize undetected occult invasion, consideration of sampling noninvasive low-grade ovarian serous tumors with at least 2 sections/cm of maximum tumor diameter may be warranted. The eosinophilic cell type of microinvasion, or microinvasive carcinoma, regardless of size, should prompt further sampling to identify overt carcinoma. The eosinophilic type of microinvasion was never seen alone in this cohort and by itself may be biologically insignificant.