Fairness, assumptions, and guarantees for extended bounded response LTL+P synthesis

3Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Realizability and reactive synthesis from temporal logics are fundamental problems in formal verification. The complexity of these problems for linear temporal logic with past (LTL+P) led to the identification of fragments with lower complexities and simpler algorithms. Recently, the logic of extended bounded response LTL+P (LTLEBR+P for short) has been introduced. It allows one to express safety languages definable in LTL+P and it is provided with an efficient, fully symbolic algorithm for reactive synthesis. This paper features four related contributions. First, we introduce GR-EBR, an extension of LTLEBR+P with fairness conditions, assumptions, and guarantees that, on the one hand, allows one to express properties beyond the safety fragment and, on the other, it retains the efficiency of LTLEBR+P in practice. Second, we the expressiveness of GR-EBR starting from the expressiveness of its fragments. In particular, we prove that: (1) LTLEBR+P is expressively complete with respect to the safety fragment of LTL+P, (2) the removal of past operators from LTLEBR+P results into a loss of expressive power, and (3) GR-EBR is expressively equivalent to the logic GR(1) of Bloem et al. Third, we provide a fully symbolic algorithm for the realizability problem from GR-EBR specifications, that reduces it to a number of safety subproblems. Fourth, to ensure soundness and completeness of the algorithm, we propose and exploit a general framework for safety reductions in the context of realizability of (fragments of) LTL+P. The experimental evaluation shows promising results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cimatti, A., Geatti, L., Gigante, N., Montanari, A., & Tonetta, S. (2024). Fairness, assumptions, and guarantees for extended bounded response LTL+P synthesis. Software and Systems Modeling, 23(2), 427–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-023-01122-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free