Qualitative comparison of 2D and 3D atmospheric corrosion detection methods

7Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, we report the use of a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) to apply a qualitative assessment of atmospheric corrosion on steel samples. From the CLSM, we obtain high-resolution images, together with a 3D heightmap. The performance of four different segmentation algorithms that use the high-resolution images as input is qualitatively assessed and discussed. A novel 3D segmentation algorithm based on the shape index is presented and compared to the 2D segmentation algorithms. From this analysis, we conclude that there is a significant difference in performance between the 2D segmentation algorithms and that the 3D method can be an added value to the detection of corrosion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Kerf, T., Hasheminejad, N., Blom, J., & Vanlanduit, S. (2021). Qualitative comparison of 2D and 3D atmospheric corrosion detection methods. Materials, 14(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14133621

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free