Accuracy of frozen-section analysis in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors: A systematic quantitative review

102Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A quantitative systematic review was performed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of frozen sections in ovarian tumors. Studies that compared frozen sections and paraffin sections within subjects for diagnosis of ovarian tumors were included. Fourteen primary studies were analyzed, which included 3 659 women. For benign ovarian vs borderline/malignant tumor cases, the occurrence of a positive frozen-section result for benignity (pooled likelihood ratio [LR], 8.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3-10.4) and posttest probability for benign diagnosis was 95% (95% CI, 94-96%). A positive frozen-section result for malignant vs benign diagnosis (pooled LR, 303; 95% CI, 101-605) increased the probability of ovarian cancer to 98% (95% CI, 97-99%). In borderline vs benign ovarian tumor cases, a positive frozen-section result (pooled LR, 69; 95% CI, 45-106) increased the probability of borderline tumors to 79% (95% CI, 71-85%). In borderline vs malignant ovarian tumor cases, a positive frozen-section result (pooled LR, 18; 95% CI, 13-26) increased the probability of borderline tumors to 51% (95% CI, 42-60%). We conclude that diagnostic accuracy rates for frozen-section analysis is high for malignant and benign ovarian tumors, but the accuracy rates in borderline tumors remain relatively low. © 2005 IGCS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Medeiros, L. R., Rosa, D. D., Edelweiss, M. I., Stein, A. T., Bozzetti, M. C., Zelmanowicz, A., … Carballo, M. T. (2005). Accuracy of frozen-section analysis in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors: A systematic quantitative review. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. Blackwell Publishing Inc. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200503000-00002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free