Lack of ST-segment depression normalization after PCI is a predictor of 5-year mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

8Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The significance of dynamic changes in a depressed ST-segment in the reciprocal changes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unknown, so the aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of reciprocal ST-segment depression normalization (STN) on long-term mortality in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI. Methods and Results: Data for 247 consecutive patients with STEMI were analyzed; 84 patients were excluded because of exclusion or incomplete inclusion criteria, so finally, 163 patients successfully treated with primary PCI were included. The study group was divided into 3 subgroups according to percentage of STN: poor STN (<30%), partial STN (30-70%), complete STN (>70%). Complete STN occurred in 63%, partial in 24% and poor in 13% of patients. STN correlated with late mortality (15% vs 28% vs 38% respectively, p=0.012). Patients who died during the follow-up period had a lower mean percentage reduction of initial ST-segment depression after PCI (50% vs 75%, p=0.001). Percentage reduction of initial ST-segment depression after PCI was a significant and independent risk factor of long-term mortality (odds ratio 1.01; 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.02; p=0.02). Conclusions: These data revealed the use of reciprocal changes normalization as a novel tool for assessment of long-term risk of death in patients after successful primary PCI for STEMI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kozuch, M., Dobrzycki, S., Nowak, K., Prokopczuk, P., Kralisz, P., Bachorzewska-Gajewska, H., … Musial, W. J. (2007). Lack of ST-segment depression normalization after PCI is a predictor of 5-year mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation Journal, 71(12), 1851–1856. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.71.1851

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free