Is there an apparent diffusion coefficient threshold in predicting tissue viability in hyperacute stroke?

157Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Purpose - Rapid and precise identification of the penumbra is important for decision-making in acute stroke. We sought to determine whether an early and moderate decrease in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) may help to identify, within the diffusion/perfusion (DWI/PWI) mismatch, those areas that will eventually evolve toward infarction. Methods - We reviewed 48 patients not treated by thrombolytics who had a DWI/PWI within 6 hours after onset, with infarct evolution documented by follow-up magnetic resonance on days 2 to 4. We calculated absolute values for ADC and the ADC ratio (ADCr) in (1) the initial DWI hypersignal; (2) the final volume of the infarct, ie, the follow-up fluid-attenuated inversion recovery abnormalities; (3) the infarct growth (IGR) area; and (4) the oligemic area (OLI) that remained viable despite initial hemodynamic disturbance. We tested the value of the ADC to predict tissue outcome by using discriminant analysis. Results - ADC values were marginally but significantly decreased in the IGR area (ADC 782±82×10-6 mm2/s, ADCr 0.94±0.08) compared with mirror values (P=0.01) and with OLI (ADC 823±41×10-6 mm2/s, ADCr 0.99±0.07; P=0.001). Of all quantitative DWI and PWI parameters, the ADCr best discriminated between IGR and OLI (F1,50=13.6, cutoff=0.97, 64% sensitivity, 92% specificity) and between the final volume of infarct and OLI (F1,83=219, cutoff=0.91, 91% sensitivity, 100% specificity). Conclusions - A simple approach based on ADC alone may allow the identification of tissue at risk of infarction in acute-stroke patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oppenheim, C., Grandin, C., Samson, Y., Smith, A., Duprez, T., Marsault, C., & Cosnard, G. (2001). Is there an apparent diffusion coefficient threshold in predicting tissue viability in hyperacute stroke? Stroke, 32(11), 2486–2491. https://doi.org/10.1161/hs1101.098331

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free