Abstract
An occlusive hydrocolloid dressing (Comfeel Ulcus) was compared with a conventional wet saline gauze dressing regarding the effect on ulcer cleansing and healing processes, experience of pain and the consumption of nursing time, in a controlled, randomized and partially single-blind study with parallel groups of long-stay patients with pressure sores. After a few weeks' treatment the relative decrease in ulcer areas with time was larger in the group treated with the hydrocolloid dressing. The difference was alsmost statistically significant at week 5 (p=0.054) and definite at week 6 (p=0.006). At week 6 the median remaining ulcer area in per cent of the initial area was 0% in the hydrocolloid dressing group and 31% in the group treated with the saline gauze (p=0.016). Analysis of the healing distribution function showed the hydrocolloid dressing to be more effective, although the overall difference was non-significant (p=0.15). Care of the pressure sore took significantly less time with hydrocolloid dressings.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Alm, A., Hornmark, A. M., Fall, P. A., Linder, L., Bergstrand, B., Ehrnebo, M., … Setterberg, G. (1989). Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, Supplement, 69(149), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2340/000155551989149110
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.