Integrating sex-bias into studies of archaic introgression on chromosome X

7Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Evidence of interbreeding between archaic hominins and humans comes from methods that infer the locations of segments of archaic haplotypes, or ‘archaic coverage’ using the genomes of people living today. As more estimates of archaic coverage have emerged, it has become clear that most of this coverage is found on the autosomes— very little is retained on chromosome X. Here, we summarize published estimates of archaic coverage on autosomes and chromosome X from extant human samples. We find on average 7 times more archaic coverage on autosomes than chromosome X, and identify broad continental patterns in this ratio: greatest in European samples, and least in South Asian samples. We also perform extensive simulation studies to investigate how the amount of archaic coverage, lengths of coverage, and rates of purging of archaic coverage are affected by sex-bias caused by an unequal sex ratio within the archaic introgressors. Our results generally confirm that, with increasing male sex-bias, less archaic coverage is retained on chromosome X. Ours is the first study to explicitly model such sex-bias and its potential role in creating the dearth of archaic coverage on chromosome X.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chevy, E. T., Huerta-Sánchez, E., & Ramachandran, S. (2023). Integrating sex-bias into studies of archaic introgression on chromosome X. PLoS Genetics, 19(8 August). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010399

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free