Ambiguous Credentials: How Learners Use and Make Sense of Massively Open Online Courses

12Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Researchers have investigated the demography and styles of engagement of those who enroll in MOOCs but have lent little attention to how learners navigate MOOCs’ ambiguity as academic certifications. Analyzing semi-structured interviews with 60 people who devoted substantial time to at least one MOOC between 2014–2017, we find that people use MOOCs to build skills for application at work and home, build relationships, navigate life transitions, and enhance formal presentations of self, at the same time that they disagree on the meaning of MOOC completions as official academic accomplishments. Our findings build theory on the multi-dimensional character of credential prestige that can inform educational social scientists and credential providers in an increasingly complicated postsecondary ecosystem.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Laryea, K., Paepcke, A., Mirzaei, K., & Stevens, M. L. (2021). Ambiguous Credentials: How Learners Use and Make Sense of Massively Open Online Courses. Journal of Higher Education, 92(4), 596–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2020.1851571

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free