Deciphering the Physiological Responses to the Intake of Plant-Based Meat Analogues: On the Track of Microbiota and Biomarkers in Serum and Urine

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Growing concerns about the alleged negative outcomes of the consumption of animal-based foods (ABF) lead a number of consumers to demand so-called plant-based meat analogues (PBMAs), which are designed to replicate the sensory and nutritional characteristics of genuine meat. This study aimed to characterize the physiological effects of long-term PBMA consumption by comparing their specific influence on both gut microbiota and fluids (i.e., plasma and urine) with those of conventional beef in a rodent model by using metagenomic and metabolomic tools. Twenty-one Wistar rats were divided into groups and consumed diets made with either wheat- and soy-based meat analogues or beef. The microbiota of PBMA-fed animals showed increased amounts of the harmful genus of gut bacteria, while their metabolomes reflected disturbances in the nitrogen-containing compound metabolism and the presence of potentially harmful metabolites. These results should raise concern and prompt further research into the long-term impact of consumption of PBMAs on health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sánchez-Terrón, G., Martínez, R., Morcuende, D., & Estévez, M. (2025). Deciphering the Physiological Responses to the Intake of Plant-Based Meat Analogues: On the Track of Microbiota and Biomarkers in Serum and Urine. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 73(36), 22698–22713. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5c02799

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free