Agile evaluation including two pragmatic trials on the uptake of a digital screening service

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Digital screening may divert lower-risk persons to lower-cost online screening, or offer higher-risk non-responders a more acceptable alternative. Population-based uptake estimates are lacking. We conducted four studies within four weeks by inviting 1700 Londoners (40–74 years, without cardiovascular disease) to a digital Health Check. A six-arm pragmatic unregistered randomised controlled trial (RCT) tested different Short Message Service (SMS) invitations. Uptake varied from 12% (standard SMS) to 20% (shortest SMS, P = 0.009). We tested three sequential reminders (an SMS, a second pragmatic trial [SMS vs postal reminder], and a final SMS). The first SMS reminder increased uptake by +3%. The postal reminder (+7%) was twice as effective as the SMS reminder (+3%, P < 0.0001). The “final reminder” SMS added +7%. Altogether, shorter invites, multi-modal reminders, and a “final reminder” all increased uptake. Adding digital care to in person care may raise uptake from 50 to 60%. Agile evaluations can rapidly improve invitation systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tillmann, T., Copas, A., Stokes, P., Udell, N., Stead, J., Lim, J., & Libow, G. (2025). Agile evaluation including two pragmatic trials on the uptake of a digital screening service. Npj Digital Medicine, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01672-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free