Health Technology Assessment: informed by science or in the service of politics?

4Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The youth of Health Technology Assessment (HTA), as an institutional policy at the national level, signals the need to reflect on how its implementation took place under the perspective of its insertion in health policy and the scientific field. At the end of its first decade, these questions arise: has HTA translated into a health policy informed by science? Has its scientific foundation been used in the service of politics? To understand this political process, we apply the multiplestreams framework formulated by John Kingdon. The use of science to inform policy and the political use of science present themselves in an unstable balance. The survival of this policy will depend not only on science but on the art of orchestrating the interests of various agents so that HTA becomes a health policy for strengthening and sustainability of SUS. DESCRIPTORS: Biomedical Technology Assessment. Health Technology Assessment. Science, Technology, and Health Innovation Management. National Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy. Science, Technology, and Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Soárez, P. C. (2021). Health Technology Assessment: informed by science or in the service of politics? Revista de Saude Publica, 55, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003234

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free