A Study of 24-h Efficacy and Safety of Sepetaprost vs. Latanoprost in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding the 24-h efficacy and safety of a novel therapy option, sepetaprost ophthalmic solution 0.002% vs. latanoprost ophthalmic solution 0.005%, may delineate its future position in glaucoma treatment. Methods: In this exploratory study (EudraCT 2020-004836-93), adults with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) were randomized to sepetaprost or latanoprost for 3 months following a ≤ 35-day screening period. The primary endpoint was mean 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) at month 3 with sepetaprost vs. latanoprost. Safety outcomes included rate of adverse events (AEs). Results: Overall, 33 participants received treatment (sepetaprost, n = 17; latanoprost, n = 16). Mean 24-h IOP was numerically lower with sepetaprost vs. latanoprost at month 3 (− 0.88 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI] − 2.89, 1.14; not statistically significant at the 0.05 level [NS]). Mean change from baseline in IOP at month 3 ranged from − 5.63 to − 7.00 mmHg for sepetaprost and − 3.84 to − 6.66 mmHg for latanoprost. Lower nocturnal IOP was observed with sepetaprost vs. latanoprost at month 3 (− 1.61 mmHg difference; 95% CI − 4.05, 0.83; not statistically significant; however, the 90% CI was − 5.27, − 0.17 and therefore, nominal statistical significance was achieved at the 0.10 level). Mean difference between groups indicated similar, or numerically lower, IOP with sepetaprost at individual time points at week 6 and month 3. At 36 and 48 h following sepetaprost cessation, mean IOP was lower vs. baseline IOP at the same time points. AEs occurred in 13 (76.5%) vs. 11 (68.8%) participants treated with sepetaprost vs. latanoprost. Conclusion: In participants with POAG or OHT, mean 24-h IOP and nocturnal IOP at month 3 were consistently numerically lower with sepetaprost vs. latanoprost. Safety profiles were similar between groups. Trial Registration: EudraCT 2020-004836-93.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Konstas, A. G., Garhöfer, G., Lübke, J., Voykov, B., & Ropo, A. (2025). A Study of 24-h Efficacy and Safety of Sepetaprost vs. Latanoprost in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. Advances in Therapy, 42(8), 3810–3825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03227-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free