Comparison of air and perfluorocarbon filled microbubbles for ultrasound contrast studies

7Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of different gasses on contrast studies a new contrast agent ST68 (US patent 5,352,436) was produced with either air (ST68-Air) or perfluorocarbon (ST68-PFC) filled microbubbles. ST68 was administrated to 11 rabbits. In 4 animals a qualitative comparison of duration and degree of enhancement was performed. ST68-PFC produced greater vascular enhancement than did ST68-PFC. Also, the former achieved gray scale enhancement - unlike the latter. Enhancement with ST68-PFC lasted over 8 minutes, while ST68-Air lasted less than 2 minutes. Quantitative dose-responses (averaged over 5 injections) were calculated, via spectral power analysis, using data from 7 rabbits and a 10 MHz cuff-transducer placed around the distal aorta. Maximum enhancement with ST68-Air was 18.3 dB for a 0.13 ml/kg dose, while ST68-PFC produced 26.1 dB of enhancement for a 0.1 ml/kg dose. In conclusion, perfluorocarbon filled microbubbles appear to be superior to air filled ones for use in an ultrasound contrast agent.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Forsberg, F., Rawool, N. M., Merton, D. A., Liu, J. B., Wang, W., Kankate, P., … Wheatley, M. A. (1996). Comparison of air and perfluorocarbon filled microbubbles for ultrasound contrast studies. In Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium (Vol. 2, pp. 1337–1340). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ultsym.1996.584293

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free