On the "Remembrance of Things Past": A Longitudinal Evaluation of the Retrospective Method

571Citations
Citations of this article
191Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study examines the extent of agreement between retrospective and prospective measures of variables in 7 different content domains: Residence changes, anthropometrics, injuries, reading ability, family characteristics, behavior problems, and delinquency. The authors evaluated retrospective reports using data from a large sample of 18-year-old youth who have been studied prospectively since their births. The findings suggested that (a) psychosocial variables (e.g., reports about subjective psychological states and family processes) revealed the lowest level of agreement between prospective and retrospective measures, and (b) even when retrospective reports correlated significantly with prospective data, the absolute level of agreement between the 2 data sources was quite poor. It appears that reliance on retrospective reports about psychosocial variables should be approached with caution. Moreover, it is suggested that the use of retrospective reports should be limited to testing hypotheses about the relative standing of individuals in a distribution and should not be used to test hypotheses that demand precision in estimating event frequencies and event dates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Henry, B., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Langley, J., & Silva, P. A. (1994). On the “Remembrance of Things Past”: A Longitudinal Evaluation of the Retrospective Method. Psychological Assessment, 6(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.2.92

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free