Comparison of symphysis morphology in normodivergent patients of the short and normal mandible

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the morphology of symphysis in normodivergent patients of short and normal mandible attending outpatient department of large public sector dental hospital of Karachi, Pakistan. Methods: This was a prospective observational study that was carried out at the outpatient department of the orthodontics, Sindh Institute of Oral Health Sciences, from June-2020 to December-2020. The study included 70 (35 in each group) patients with a normal angle MMA over the range of 25.5° ± 5.3°. McNamara analysis has been carried out including all the patients and dividing into two group's i.e., normal mandible and short mandible. On cephalogram, perpendicular distance from Pog to B-Me line, angle symphysis vertical dimension (B-B1-Gn), and angle symphysis convexity (B-Pog-Me), were measured for all patients. Results: Out of seventy (70) patients, there were 24 (34.3%) males and 46 (65.7) females. Patients were equally divided into two groups, i.e., short 35 (50.0%) and normal mandible 35 (50.0%). The mean angle of symphysis convexity, symphysis vertical dimension, and anterior prominence of symphysis of participants were 124.6 ± 42.8, 49.9 ± 4.7, and 4.1 ± 1.1 respectively. Patients with short mandible were found to have significantly higher in symphysis convexity as compared to patients of normal mandibular, i.e., 136.54 ± 3.55 and 112.74 ± 58.53 respectively, (p-value= 0.022). Conclusion: Symphysis convexity was found greater in short mandible patients showing that in short mandible patients, symphysis was flatter anteriorly, less convex, and less prominent.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khan, E. B., Kumari, H., Bibi, A., Mottani, D., & Kumar, S. (2021). Comparison of symphysis morphology in normodivergent patients of the short and normal mandible. Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences, 15(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.36570/JDUHS.2021.1.1103

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free