Subjectivity, Arbitrariness, Austrian value theory,and a reply to Leithner

8Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Contrary to the Austrian community’s former perception, we revealed value investing’s incompatibility with Austrian economics (Rapp, Olbrich, and Venitz, 2017). However, Leithner (2017) disagrees with this conclusion. He primarily argues that an analysis of value concepts should be neglected in favor of a discussion of the methods value investors apply to “measure” value to diagnose whether or not they adhere to Austrian value theory. Moreover, he claims that value investors use terms imprecisely and that intrinsic value is actually meant to be subjective, even conceptually. However, we believe Leithner’s remarks suffer from fundamental misunderstandings and error. He is mistaken on Austrian value theory, subjectivity, and the conceptual foundations of value investing. Therefore, we gladly accept the offer to address his misapprehensions and to sharpen the Austrian understanding on investment decisions in general.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rapp, D. J., Olbrichand, M., & Venitz, C. (2018). Subjectivity, Arbitrariness, Austrian value theory,and a reply to Leithner. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 21(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.35297/001c.118925

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free