Review of rope-based access methods for the forest canopy: Safe and unsafe practices in published information sources and a summary of current methods

47Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The availability of reliable information on tree climbing methods is critical for the development of canopy science and for the safety of workers accessing the forest canopy. To assess the breadth and quality of information contained in published climbing information, we performed searches in Web of Science and Google Scholar and evaluated 54 published sources on 10 predetermined criteria related to safety. We found a high incidence of unsafe recommendations that, if followed, could result in serious injury or death. Common errors included recommendations for equipment not suitable for tree climbing, advocating methods suitable for rock climbing but that can result in falls and trauma in tree climbing, and outdated information that no longer reflects best practices. We conclude by providing safety recommendations and a short review of tree climbing methods. This article thus serves as a guide for finding and interpreting best sources of methods for canopy access.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anderson, D. L., Koomjian, W., French, B., Altenhoff, S. R., & Luce, J. (2015, August 1). Review of rope-based access methods for the forest canopy: Safe and unsafe practices in published information sources and a summary of current methods. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. British Ecological Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12393

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free