A retrospective analysis to estimate the healthcare resource utilization and cost associated with treatment-resistant depression in commercially insured US patients

20Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective The economic burden of commercially insured patients in the United States with treatment-resistant depression and patients with non–treatment-resistant major depressive disorder was compared using data from the Optum Clinformatics™ claims database. Methods Patients 18–63 years on antidepressant treatment between 1/1/13 and 9/30/13, who had no treatment claims for depression 6 months before the index date (first antidepressant dispensing), and who had a major depressive disorder or depression diagnosis within 30 days of the index date, were included. Treatment-resistant depression was defined as receiving 3 antidepressant regimens during 1 major depressive disorder episode. Patients with treatment-resistant depression were matched with patients with non–treatment-resistant major depressive disorder at a 1:4 ratio using propensity score matching. The study consisted of 1-year baseline (pre-index) and 2-year follow-up (post index) periods. Cost outcomes were compared using a generalized linear model. Results 2,370 treatment-resistant depression and 9,289 non–treatment-resistant major depressive disorder patients were included. In year 1 of the follow-up period, compared with non–treatment-resistant major depressive disorder, patients with treatment-resistant depression had: more emergency department visits (odds ratio = 1.39, 95% confidence interval = 1.24–1.56); more inpatient hospitalizations (odds ratio = 1.73, 95% confidence interval = 1.46–2.05); longer hospital stays (mean difference vs non–treatment-resistant major depressive disorder = 2.86, 95% confidence interval = 0.86–4.86 days); and more total healthcare costs (mean difference vs non–treatment-resistant major depressive disorder = US$3,846, 95% confidence interval = $2,855-$4,928). These patterns remained consistent in year 2 of the follow-up period. Conclusion Treatment-resistant depression was associated with higher healthcare resource utilization and costs versus non–treatment-resistant major depressive disorder in this commercially insured cohort of patients in the United States.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, G., Zhang, L., DiBernardo, A., Wang, G., Sheehan, J. J., Lee, K., … Zhang, Q. (2020). A retrospective analysis to estimate the healthcare resource utilization and cost associated with treatment-resistant depression in commercially insured US patients. PLoS ONE, 15(9 September). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238843

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free