Comparison of four serological tests to determine the CagA or VacA status of Helicobacter pylori strains

42Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We compared four tests for antibodies to CagA or VacA, HelicoBlot 2.0, RIDA Blot Helicobacter, CHIRON RIBA H. pylori SIA, and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using recombinant CagA. Immunoblot assays were accurate for determining Helicobacter pylori status but poor for determining CagA or VacA status (accuracy, 66 to 80% for CagA status and 34 to 67% for VacA status). None can be recommended for determining CagA or VacA status.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yamaoka, Y., Kodama, T., Graham, D. Y., & Kashima, K. (1998). Comparison of four serological tests to determine the CagA or VacA status of Helicobacter pylori strains. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 36(11), 3433–3434. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.36.11.3433-3434.1998

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free