Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of rifapentine and rifampicin in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods: Seventy-two cases of patients with initial treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis who attended the First Hospital Affiliated to Hebei North University from February 2017 to August 2019 were selected. They were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 36 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with isoniazid + rifapentine + ethambutol, while the control group was treated with isoniazid + rifampicin + ethambutol. The symptom relief, image absorption and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results: The rate of symptom relief was 86.11% in the observation group and 94.44% in the control group, P < 0.05, which was statistically significant. Rifampin was more helpful than rifapentine in relieving clinical symptoms. The lesion absorption rate was 77.79% in the observation group and 88.89% in the control group, P < 0.05, and the difference was statistically significant. Rifampin was more beneficial to the absorption of TB lesions than rifapentine. The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 16.67% much lower than that in the control group, which was 38.89%, indicating that the adverse reactions of rifapentine were less. Conclusion: Rifampicin is superior to rifapentine in clinical symptom relief and lesion absorption, but the incidence of adverse reactions is high.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lin, W., Zhang, Y., Liu, Z., Feng, P., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2021). Effect of Rifapentine and Rifampicin on Anti-Tuberculosis. Journal of Tuberculosis Research, 09(03), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtr.2021.93019
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.