Between the Atomic Bomb and the War Crimes: Denialism and Japanese Historiography in Perspective

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper proposes a discussion on the denial of war crimes committed by the Japanese state during the Second Sino-Japanese War, considering the complex relationship between Japanese historiography about war crimes committed by Japan and the negationist mobilizations. We conclude that the narratives about the atomic bombs dropped on Japan are used both as a way to legitimize the negationist discourse (the idea of victimization), and to corroborate with an engaged historiography (which in no way amnesty the Japanese State) that intends to understand the past in its complexity, being Japan victim and executioner, depending on the context and the subjects/ institutions involved. Therefore, I seek to analyze how Japanese historiography reacts to denials based on logics and practices that understand the narrative about the past from a non-Manichean view between victim and executioner.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neto, M. M. (2021). Between the Atomic Bomb and the War Crimes: Denialism and Japanese Historiography in Perspective. Revista Brasileira de Historia, 41(87), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93472021V42N87-04

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free