Scientific abstracts: Texts, contexts, and subtexts

10Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In their 4000-year history, abstracts have taken several forms and represented a variety of documents. The scientific journal emerged in the 1600s and gave rise to what would become the modern scientific abstract. Here, I describe the contexts in which abstracts evolved, address the subtexts of opinions about their purpose, and review the texts of 12 kinds of abstracts. For most readers, articles do not exist beyond abstracts. However, the quality of abstracts is often poor. Inaccuracies are common, serious, widespread, and long-standing. Abstracts should inform only the choice of what to read and never what to do.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lang, T. A. (2022). Scientific abstracts: Texts, contexts, and subtexts. European Science Editing. European Association of Science Editors. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2022.e85616

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free