Abstract
In their 4000-year history, abstracts have taken several forms and represented a variety of documents. The scientific journal emerged in the 1600s and gave rise to what would become the modern scientific abstract. Here, I describe the contexts in which abstracts evolved, address the subtexts of opinions about their purpose, and review the texts of 12 kinds of abstracts. For most readers, articles do not exist beyond abstracts. However, the quality of abstracts is often poor. Inaccuracies are common, serious, widespread, and long-standing. Abstracts should inform only the choice of what to read and never what to do.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lang, T. A. (2022). Scientific abstracts: Texts, contexts, and subtexts. European Science Editing. European Association of Science Editors. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2022.e85616
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.