Ethnographic Film, Fourth Cinema and Situated Knowledge Practices—from Colonial Film to Collaborative Research

3Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The text attempts to understand the development of collaborative audiovisual knowledge practices in anthropology as situated and diffractive knowledge (Haraway, Barad, Smith). By considering specific stages in the history of collaborative and participatory projects, the article argues that collaborative filmmaking is not only a decentering of one-sided authorship and one-sided modes of representation, but also a media-specific form of knowledge that is bound to and embedded in social contexts. Through the example of colonial film, the article describes stations of demarcation and attempts to decolonize film. Current film experiments with marginalized groups have their origins in “shared anthropologies” (Rouch) and have further developed this approach through more consistent forms of Fourth Cinema and power sharing with Indigenous communities. Film is thus also able to depict amateur knowledge practices within collaborative research projects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bee, J. (2024). Ethnographic Film, Fourth Cinema and Situated Knowledge Practices—from Colonial Film to Collaborative Research. NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine, 32(3), 213–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00048-024-00399-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free