Competing Inequalities? on the Intersection of Gender and Ethnicity in Candidate Nominations in Indian Elections

41Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Quotas for women and ethnic minorities are implemented to increase diversity in political institutions, but, as they usually target only one group at a time, they may end up increasing the inclusion of one under-represented group at the cost of another. Recent work has emphasized the institutional underpinnings of the variation in such outcomes. In this article I show how the intersectional effects of quotas may also vary within the same institutional context, as changes in the pressure to include excluded groups interact with the informal opportunity structures within political parties. Looking at the nomination of female candidates across India over time, I show that, as the efforts to include more women in politics intensified, much of the increase in female candidates occurred in constituencies reserved for ethnic minorities. This pattern may in part be the result of parties resisting changes to existing power hierarchies by nominating women at the cost of the least powerful male politicians, but can also be seen as evidence that minority quotas have created a political space that is more accessible to women.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jensenius, F. R. (2016). Competing Inequalities? on the Intersection of Gender and Ethnicity in Candidate Nominations in Indian Elections. In Government and Opposition (Vol. 51, pp. 440–463). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2016.8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free