Consider the xenobot: moral status for intelligent machines revisited

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Can intelligent machines be morally considerable? Should they be? For environmental ethicists, the answer to both questions is plainly ‘no.’ That is, because artificial intelligence (AI) systems are neither alive nor natural they do not warrant moral concern. But these conclusions are not shared by philosophers of technology, who find artifacts in general and certain technological entities in particular eligible for moral status. In this essay, we seek to overcome this discrepancy by arguing that intelligent machines can and should be morally considerable. We show how environmental ethics has neglected important insights from philosophy of technology, inadequately assessed the status of technology in the Anthropocene, and failed to appreciate a pluriversal view of ethics. We illustrate the possibility and necessity of expanding the moral universe to include intelligent machines by presenting a most likely case for moral considerability under both environmental ethics and philosophy of technology–the xenobot.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gellers, J. C., & Holy-Luczaj, M. (2026). Consider the xenobot: moral status for intelligent machines revisited. Law, Innovation and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2025.2593778

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free