A critical analysis of Australian clinical ethics committees and the functions they serve

26Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The predominant function of Australian clinical ethics committees (CECs) is policy formation. Some committees have an educational role. Few committees play any direct role in advising on ethics in the management of individual patients and this occurs only in exceptional circumstances. There is a tendency to exaggerate both the number and function of committees. It is suggested that studies of ethics committees, based on questionnaire surveys, should be interpreted cautiously. An examination of ethical issues indicates that there is a role for a critical analysis of power relations in Australian hospitals that is not fulfilled by CECs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McNeill, P. M. (2001). A critical analysis of Australian clinical ethics committees and the functions they serve. In Bioethics (Vol. 15, pp. 443–460). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00253

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free