Development of A Fall-prevention Care Behavior Evaluation Scale for Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment in A General Ward, with the Aim of Avoiding Physical Restraints during Hospitalization

  • Makino M
  • Kato M
  • Naruse S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: The present study aimed to develop a fall-prevention care evaluation scale for older adults with cognitive impairment in a general ward from the time of admission to avoid physical restraint and to examine the scale's validity and reliability. Methods: We asked 1128 nurses in general wards across Japan to take a self-administered anonymous questionnaire survey comprising scale of the 54 items. We received 308 responses, a response rate of 27.3%. We analyzed 303 nurses. Results: Our exploratory factor analysis (principal factor method: promax rotation) revealed a structure comprised of 5 factors and 22 items; the former were defined as [an approach that aims to convince from the time of hospitalization], [collaborative fall prevention that avoids the use of physical restraint], [care attitude that respects that person], [fall prevention technology to avoid restraint], and [Supporting activities that respect that person]. Model goodness-of-fit indices were as follows: CFI = .949, RMSEA = .061, a criterion-related validity of .792, a Cronbach's alpha of .947, and a test-retest reliability coefficient of .783. Conclusions: The above results show the validity and reliability of this scale. It was suggested that this scale could be used by a team of nurses to conduct fall-prevention care for the older adults with cognitive impairment to avoid physical restraints.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Makino, M., Kato, M., & Naruse, S. (2020). Development of A Fall-prevention Care Behavior Evaluation Scale for Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment in A General Ward, with the Aim of Avoiding Physical Restraints during Hospitalization. Journal of Japan Academy of Nursing Science, 40(0), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.5630/jans.40.349

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free