Alpha Air Sample Counting Efficiency Versus Dust Loading: Evaluation of a Large Data Set

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Dust loading on air sample filters is known to cause a loss of efficiency for direct counting of alpha activity on the filters, but the amount of dust loading and the correction factor needed to account for attenuated alpha particles is difficult to assess. In this paper, correction factors are developed by statistical analysis of a large database of air sample results for a uranium and plutonium processing facility at the Savannah River Site. As is typically the case, dust-loading data is not directly available, but sample volume is found to be a reasonable proxy measure; the amount of dust loading is inferred by a combination of the derived correction factors and a Monte Carlo model. The technique compares the distribution of activity ratios [beta/(beta + alpha)] by volume and applies a range of correction factors on the raw alpha count rate. The best-fit results with this method are compared with MCNP modeling of activity uniformly deposited in the dust and analytical laboratory results of digested filters. A linear fit is proposed to evenly-deposited alpha activity collected on filters with dust loading over a range of about 2 mg cm-2 to 1,000 mg cm-2.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hogue, M. G., Gause-Lott, S. M., Owensby, B. N., Slack, T. M., Smiley, J. J., & Burkett, J. L. (2018). Alpha Air Sample Counting Efficiency Versus Dust Loading: Evaluation of a Large Data Set. Health Physics, 114(5), 479–485. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000000800

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free