Erratum: How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals (PLoS ONE (2015) 10:9 e0139783))

8Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nguyen, V. M., Haddaway, N. R., Gutowsky, L. F. G., Wilson, A. D. M., Gallagher, A. J., & Donaldson, M. R. (2015, September 29). Erratum: How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals (PLoS ONE (2015) 10:9 e0139783)). PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139783

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free