Teacher written vs. Audio feedback on undergraduates’ written assignments

4Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

—Due to the importance of instructor’s feedback on students’ written assignment as part of formative assessment and the relatively new way of delivering audio feedback, this case study aimed to explore instructor’s audio vs. written feedback provided on 15 pairs of undergraduates’ written tasks through Google Docs over an academic semester in a Saudi public university. The data was collected from actual feedback comments in both modes and follow-up interviews with the students. The content analysis of feedback revealed that audio feedback differed from written feedback in terms of quantity and content. Despite the potential of audio feedback revealed through the content analysis, the majority of students (16) preferred written feedback over audio feedback for its clarity, easiness, easy access to feedback and its focus on a certain issue in the assignments, whereas 14 of them preferred audio feedback. Several challenges highlighted by the students, including its length and detailed instruction and the difficulty in accessing it served as good points for several pedagogical implications for instructors in this study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alharbi, M. A., & Alghammas, A. (2021). Teacher written vs. Audio feedback on undergraduates’ written assignments. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(12), 1562–1570. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1112.08

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free