The practice of ideas in gender equality policy: comparative lessons from the field

7Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This thematic section seeks to contribute to emerging research on gender and policy that combines post-adoption and ideational approaches to address how and why ideas matter in gender equality policy implementation. In this article, the two research streams are first discussed. Next, the potential ingredients for gender transformation from current research are presented and then examined in the cases of post-adoption in Spain, the UK, the Netherlands, France and the Council of Europe in the four contributions to the thematic section. The concluding comparative assessment confirms what research has already found: the interplay between actors, ideas and institutions is crucial. Who comes forward and the ideas and political meanings those actors advance are what ultimately matter, dictated in certain policy sectors by the institutional micro-foundations of that domain. The article ends with the lessons learned from, and next steps that come out of, this thematic section.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bustelo, M., & Mazu, A. G. (2023, February 1). The practice of ideas in gender equality policy: comparative lessons from the field. European Journal of Politics and Gender. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16696345290590

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free