‘A Rough Trade’? Towards a More Sustainable Minerals Supply Chain

  • Dam-de Jong D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Target 16.6 of the 2015 Sustainable Development Goals ( sdg s) seeks to create ‘effective, accountable and transparent institutions at all levels’ for the purpose of achieving sustainable development. Nevertheless, the inherent vagueness of the notions of transparency and accountability poses difficulties for achieving the target. This is why this article examines how these notions have been conceptualized in international legal discourse and applied in practice. It does so within the context of the trade in natural resources that finance armed conflict, which is considered detrimental to the development opportunities of developing countries. The article examines how two of the most important initiatives in this field, namely the Kimberley Process for the Certification of Rough Diamonds and the oecd Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-affected and High-risk Areas, operationalize transparency and accountability. It posits that both initiatives fall short of establishing full accountability. However, notwithstanding their flaws and limitations, they make a valuable contribution to achieving target 16.6.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dam-de Jong, D. (2019). ‘A Rough Trade’? Towards a More Sustainable Minerals Supply Chain. Brill Open Law, 2(1), 8–39. https://doi.org/10.1163/23527072-20191014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free