Evaluation of 3- to 8-year treatment outcomes and success rates with 6 implant brands in partially edentulous patients

5Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The use of osseointegrated implants as a foundation for the prosthetic replacement of missing teeth has become widespread, with new dental implant systems being introduced every year. There is growing interest in identifying the factors associated with implant failure, such as implant type. This study was designed to establish the relationship between implant type and success. Eighty-eight patients (mean age, 52 years) with 268 implants (110 BioHorizons, 60 ITI, 60 Paragon, 18 Xive, six 3i, and 19 Allfit) participated in this 5-year retrospective study. Statistical significance was defined for P , .05. Peri-implant probing depth was associated with bone loss and bleeding on probing. Implant failure was not associated with implant brand. Maximal (or minimal) peri-implant probing depth and bone loss values were seen at anterior regions (or premolars). Maximal (or minimal) bleeding on probing was seen at the posterior (or anterior) region. No significant differences were observed between the different syste zs in terms of implant failure.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moeintaghavi, A., Radvar, M., Arab, H. R., Boostani, H. R., & Ghiami, E. (2012). Evaluation of 3- to 8-year treatment outcomes and success rates with 6 implant brands in partially edentulous patients. Journal of Oral Implantology, 38(SUPPL. 1), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00117

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free