Potentials and limitations of SAR image simulators - A comparative study of three simulation approaches

65Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Various applications, like for instance algorithm design, mission planning, geo-referencing, change detection, Automatic Target Recognition (ATR) or SAR data analysis, rely on simulated synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images. However, there are different SAR simulation techniques with different advantages and disadvantages. Depending on the needs of a certain application, a suitable SAR simulation technique has to be used. This paper compares three SAR image simulation approaches, RaySAR, CohRaS®, and SARViz, showing their similarities and differences. RaySAR and CohRaS® are two ray tracing based SAR image simulators. RaySAR is based on the open-source software POV-Ray, while CohRaS® is developed as SAR simulator from scratch. The third simulator, SARViz, is a real-time SAR simulator based on the rasterization approach. The geometrical features of the three simulators are compared and the differences and different applications are analyzed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Balz, T., Hammer, H., & Auer, S. (2015). Potentials and limitations of SAR image simulators - A comparative study of three simulation approaches. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 101, 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.12.008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free