The explanatory coexistence of scientific and supernatural explanations: A meta-analysis

5Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The explanatory coexistence of scientific and supernatural explanations in the same mind challenges the most influential theories of knowledge acquisition in psychology. Namely, although individuals acquire the scientific theories, the supernatural explanations are also used as causal explanatory frameworks even by experts. The present review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the factors that could influence the coexistence of supernatural and scientific explanatory frameworks regarding the concepts of the origins of life, illness, and death/afterlife. On the basis of 35 identified articles (45 studies) which have been published between 1985 and 2016 and examined both scientific and supernatural explanations within these concepts, the impact of age, religiousness, scientific expertise, cultural background, and contextual factors was explored. Results suggest that although religiousness, cultural background, and contextual information have a large effect on the concepts of death/afterlife, illness, and the origins of life respectively, the magnitude of the average effect depends on the concept.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pnevmatikos, D., & Georgiadou, T. (2019). The explanatory coexistence of scientific and supernatural explanations: A meta-analysis. Psychology, 24(1), 177–205. https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.22420

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free