REINFORCEMENT OMISSION ON TEMPORAL GO—NO‐GO SCHEDULES 1

  • Staddon J
13Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Either a partial blackout, or the blackout plus a “feeder flash”, occurred in lieu of reinforcement on two procedures that produced opposite patterns of responding after reinforcement. Response rate was elevated after reinforcement omission on the procedure that produced a “pause‐and‐respond” pattern following reinforcement, but depressed after reinforcement omission on the procedure that produced a “respond‐and‐pause” pattern. The effect of blackout plus feeder flash was generally intermediate between the effects of blackout and the effects of reinforcement. These results are consistent with an interpretation of reinforcement omission effects in terms of the discriminative temporal control exerted by reinforcement and stimuli similar to it.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Staddon, J. E. R. (1972). REINFORCEMENT OMISSION ON TEMPORAL GO—NO‐GO SCHEDULES 1. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18(2), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1972.18-223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free