Ceramide-induced cell death/survival in murine osteoblasts

21Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Programmed cell death (PCD) or apoptosis is a naturally occurring cell suicide pathway induced in a variety of cell types. We determined whether ceramide treatment contributes to reduced cell viability and increased PCD in primary osteoblasts and the signalling pathways that are involved. Cell viability was determined by the 3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiozol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay. We found that C2-ceramide (≤10 -7 M) promoted osteoblast viability, whilst concentrations ≥2×10-6 M significantly reduced osteoblast viability in a dose- and time-dependent manner. The effect of ceramide on cell viability was specific since C2-dihydroceramide had no effect. Increasing intracellular ceramide levels with either sphingomyelinase (SMase) or an inhibitor of ceramide metabolism also increased osteoblast apoptosis. Ceramide-induced PCD in osteoblasts was determined by nuclear appearance and DNA fragmentation. PCD was induced by both C2-ceramide and SMase. The ability of ceramide (5×10-8 M) to promote osteoblast survival was prevented by a general protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor and by a PKC ζ inhibitor, whilst osteoblast survival was enhanced in the presence of a protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) inhibitor. Phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) inhibitors had no effect on osteoblast survival. The ability of ceramide (5×10 -5 M) to induce apoptosis was prevented by the inhibitors of PP1 and PKC δ, whilst the general PKC and PI3K inhibitors had no effect on it. Our findings suggest that ceramide signals osteoblast survival and apoptosis through different intracellular pathways, and that alteration in the intracellular levels of ceramide may play an important role in bone remodelling. © 2010 Society for Endocrinology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hill, P. A., & Tumber, A. (2010). Ceramide-induced cell death/survival in murine osteoblasts. Journal of Endocrinology, 206(2), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1677/JOE-10-0068

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free