The predictive accuracy of cardiovascular disease risk prediction tools in inflammatory arthritis and psoriasis: an observational validation study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink

  • Hughes D
  • Coronado J
  • Schofield P
  • et al.
1Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular risk prediction tools developed for the general population often underperform for individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and their predictive accuracy are unclear for other inflammatory conditions that also have increased cardiovascular risk. We investigated performance of QRISK-3, Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and Reynolds Risk Score (RRS) in RA, psoriatic disease (psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We considered osteoarthritis as a non-inflammatory comparator. METHOD(S): We utilised primary care records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum database to identify individuals with each condition and calculated 10-year cardiovascular risk using each prediction tool. Discrimination and calibration of each tool in each disease was assessed. RESULT(S): Time-dependent AUC for QRISK3 was 0.752 for RA (95% CI 0.734-0.777), 0.794 for AS (95% CI 0.764-0.812), 0.764 for PsA (95% CI 0.741-0.791),0.815 for psoriasis (95% CI 0.789-0.835), and 0.698 for osteoarthritis (95% CI 0.670-0.717) indicating reasonably good predictive performance. AUC for FRS were similar, and slightly lower for RRS. FRS was reasonably well calibrated for each condition but underpredicted risk for patients with RA. RRS tended to underpredict CVD risk, whilst QRISK3 overpredicted CVD risk, especially for the most high-risk individuals. CONCLUSION(S): CVD risk for individuals with RA, AS and psoriatic disease were generally less accurately predicted using each of the 3 CVD risk prediction tools than reported accuracies in the original publications. Individuals with osteoarthritis also had less accurate predictions suggesting inflammation is not the sole reason for underperformance. Disease specific risk prediction tools may be required.Copyright © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hughes, D. M., Coronado, J. I. C., Schofield, P., Yiu, Z. Z. N., & Zhao, S. S. (2023). The predictive accuracy of cardiovascular disease risk prediction tools in inflammatory arthritis and psoriasis: an observational validation study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kead610

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free