Science between gaps and negative space. A report on the impossibility and impracticability of open science for ethnographic and sociological research

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

From an ideal perspective, doing ethnographic research builds on an ethical handling of research data as well as a respectful relationship between researchers and their interlocutors. However, it is in this context that Open Science has its limitations. Current examples taken from anthropological research highlight the difficulties and challenges of Open Science.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eberhard, I. (2019). Science between gaps and negative space. A report on the impossibility and impracticability of open science for ethnographic and sociological research. VOEB-Mitteilungen, 72(2), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.31263/voebm.v72i2.3053

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free