Original or Translated? A Causal Analysis of the Impact of Translationese on Machine Translation Performance

Abstract

Human-translated text displays distinct features from naturally written text in the same language. This phenomena, known as translationese, has been argued to confound the machine translation (MT) evaluation. Yet, we find that existing work on translationese neglects some important factors and the conclusions are mostly correlational but not causal. In this work, we collect CAUSALMT, a dataset where the MT training data are also labeled with the human translation directions. We inspect two additional critical factors, the train-test direction match (whether the human translation directions in the training and test sets are aligned), and data-model direction match (whether the model learns in the same direction as the human translation direction in the dataset). We show that these two factors have a large causal effect on the MT performance, in addition to the test-model direction mismatch highlighted by existing work on translationese. In light of our findings, we provide a set of suggestions for MT training and evaluation.