The Recommendation or the Adjudication Authority of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia

  • Musriza M
  • Purnama E
  • Mahfud M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This research investigates the Ombudsman recommendations as the improvement of the maladministration’s prevention and the efforts that against government agencies which do not implemented their duties. This juridical-normative research uses four kinds of approach like statute, historical, conceptual and comparative approach. The Ombuds-man’s existence after 19 years establishment can be said hasn’t fully work as that institution expectation. The responsibility to accept all complaint about maladminis-tration especially in public services just relied only by issues the recommendations about conclusions and suggestions. Ombudsman doesn’t has the authority to execute the result of their investigations, so that the rules of recommendation’s implementation are weak. The 2016-2020 period’s recommendation haven’t implemented optimal enough. Therefore, recommendations as the improvement of the maladministration’s prevention need to equalizing the perspective and detailed the implementation rules, so that a stronger legal protection about the position and also the function of its recommen-dations can be achieving prosperity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Musriza, M., Purnama, E., & Mahfud, M. (2021). The Recommendation or the Adjudication Authority of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 23(2), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i2.21521

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free